CO129-305 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [5-7] — Page 728

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

Draft submitted for consn. I

have not thought it recesso.

хочу

to read coty if deck to 30/and ifdesh

ve therefore not alluded

I have

to par 2.

Ger. J +ps.

C.Pd. Jum Jan

at once

Dear Mr. Johnson,

722

INTELLIGENCE DIVISION,

WINCHESTER HOUSE,

ST. JAMES'S SQUARE,

S.W.

Hong Kong Map.

30th December, 1901.

The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist.

I am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this.

As regards the question of treating the map as confidential I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as confidential.

The map is our standard one of the country and has

The initial part of the text appears to be a jumbled collection of words and phrases, likely due to OCR errors. The coherent text begins with the letter addressed to Mr. Johnson.

Corrected version in HTML format as per the instructions:

Dear Mr. Johnson,

INTELLIGENCE DIVISION,
WINCHESTER HOUSE,
ST. JAMES'S SQUARE,
S.W.

Hong Kong Map.
30th December, 1901.

The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist.

I am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this.

As regards the question of treating the map as confidential I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as confidential.

The map is our standard one of the country and has

Edit History

2026-05-31 19:41:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Draft submitted for consn. I have not thought it recesso. хочу to read coty if deck to 30/and ifdesh ve therefore not alluded I have to par 2. Ger. J +ps. C.Pd. Jum Jan at once Dear Mr. Johnson, 722 INTELLIGENCE DIVISION, WINCHESTER HOUSE, ST. JAMES'S SQUARE, S.W. Hong Kong Map. 30th December, 1901. The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist. I am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this. As regards the question of treating the map as confidential I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as confidential. The map is our standard one of the country and has The initial part of the text appears to be a jumbled collection of words and phrases, likely due to OCR errors. The coherent text begins with the letter addressed to Mr. Johnson. Corrected version in HTML format as per the instructions: Dear Mr. Johnson, INTELLIGENCE DIVISION, WINCHESTER HOUSE, ST. JAMES'S SQUARE, S.W. Hong Kong Map. 30th December, 1901. The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist. I am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this. As regards the question of treating the map as confidential I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as confidential. The map is our standard one of the country and has
Baseline (Original)
draft submitted for conson. I have not thought it recesso. хочу to read coty if deck to 30/and ifdesh ve therefore not alluded I have to par 2. Ger. J +ps. C.Pd. Jum Jan at once Dear Mr. Johnson, 722 INTELLIGENCE DIVISION, WINCHESTER HOUSE, ST. JAMES'S SQUARE, S.W. Hong Kong Map. 30th December, 1901. The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so I that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist. am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this. As regards the question of treating the map as confiden- tial I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as confidential. The map is our standard one of the country and has The
2026-05-31 19:41:57 · Baseline
View content

draft submitted for conson. I

have not thought it recesso.

хочу

to read coty if deck to 30/and ifdesh

ve therefore not alluded

I have

to par 2.

Ger. J +ps.

C.Pd. Jum Jan

at once

Dear Mr. Johnson,

722

INTELLIGENCE DIVISION,

WINCHESTER HOUSE,

ST. JAMES'S SQUARE,

S.W.

Hong Kong Map.

30th December, 1901.

The copies supplied in April last were of the latest edition, in fact that is the only one now in existence, the alterations to the boundary were made on the actual plate so I that the older edition has, ipso facto, ceased to exist.

am sorry that the paragraph in your note of 20th March 1901, specifically asking for the older edition, was overlooked at the time, otherwise I should have drawn attention to this.

As regards the question of treating the map as confiden- tial I am afraid there has been some misunderstanding. Colonial Office note of 12th November 1900 states that the map is not to be placed on sale to the public but it was never understood from this that it was to be treated as

confidential.

The map is our standard one of the country and has

The

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.